Oracle Mobile & Business Intelligence
It's been sometime since I've had a chance to post a blog. I have been truly heads down full-time doing the product strategy/management for a new Oracle Fusion wide product and still doing my other full-time job of Product Strategy for Fusion HCM Analytics. The good news is that the product will be released soon, got a couple of new mobile/analytics patents and I am lucky enough to get to deliver the Oracle's first "official" conference presentation on it at Collaborate in April -
Session: #10475 - Oracle Fusion Tap – Mobile Solutions for the Anywhere, Anytime Worker
Description:
Oracle Fusion Tap is a collection of mobility application modules that work across the Oracle Fusion Applications Suite to provide mobile workers the ability to be productive anywhere and anytime. Hear about Oracle’s strategy for mobility in Oracle Fusion Applications and learn how this information-driven approach to mobility enables mobile workers to know what they need do, what they need to know, and whom they need to connect with to get the job done.
It's been a very exciting and creative project.
But this blog isn't solely about what I've been up to. I also wanted to share a couple of Oracle videos on Oracle Mobile and Oracle HCM BI. Enjoy
Workforce Predictions – Nice Mention by Josh Bersin
The second elephant now in this market is Oracle. With thousands of customers running various versions of Peoplesoft and Oracle e-Business Suite, Oracle knows that the Fusion HCM has a big opportunity. I had the opportunity to attend a strategic briefing with Oracle and customers and Fusion HCM is finally here.
Just so you have a little background, Fusion started in 2004 as a middleware engineering effort to help Oracle integrate its wide variety of application products (PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, Oracle, ..) into a next generation applications platform. The middleware architecture includes a variety of services (data services, authentication, identity management, security, content management, data intelligence, etc.) which enable the Fusion HCM applications to interoperate with any PeopleSoft or Oracle system. What this means is that you do not have to replace your existing PeopleSoft or Oracle applications to use Fusion HCM.
I talked with Principal Financial Group who is an early customer (existing PeopleSoft customer) and they are using Fusion HCM's compensation module alongside their existing PeopleSoft system.
Fusion HCM has some best-of-breed capabilities. One key feature is what Oracle calls the "Workforce Predictions" module, which computes the risk attributes of employees based on tenure, performance, role, compa ratio, etc. Oracle worked with Saratoga and other HR data experts to build this module - and it will grow in power as more people use the system.
While Oracle's products are not always the easiest to use, Fusion HCM is now a complete product and can be adopted without a massive replacement of existing HRMS investments. This will make Oracle's offering more compelling than ever and the company has made a major investment in sales and marketing to help drive this message forward.
Full article is her...http://joshbersin.com/2011/10/10/elephants-of-hr-software-enter-the-talent-management-market/
Identifying the “Innovators”
Today if your hear the name Apple, Tata Motors, 5 Guys or Pixar your first thought is “I just don’t like what they do. I Love what they do.” You; laughed during Cars, were awe inspired by the iPod. drove 15 miles to get that burger, and were fascinated by a profitable $2000 mass-produce car. You also didn’t just experience them once… Cars 2, iPad, second third fourth burger, Range Rover. They have brought and defined Innovation for our generation and possible the next several.
Does this mean you have to be innovative to be like Apple or 5 Guys or to compete against them? Absolutely. Just ask Palm, GM, In n Out Burgers or Disney Studios. In fact, based on a survey from the Conference Board, innovation is the #4 priority for CEOs in 2011. Innovation impacts your business in more ways than you can possibly imagine. Bill Gates once said “Microsoft’s top 10% is impactful, but if I lose my 20 most innovative software engineers Microsoft will go out of business within 12 months.”
You can’t quantify innovation by looking at a person or giving them a test. Innovation sometimes only happens when the right-mix of people get together in a team setting. So how do you identify your “innovators”? Does your company have enough of them? Does the innovation increase profitability?
You can determine who the innovators are by determining the following;
- How much does a person or team produce? - Does this team or person deliver on what ever they are given or is it hit and miss?
- Did they produce a new thing? – Is it a completely never before seen product, drug or process? Was it the next generation of something? Was it something that was a copy of another product?
- What impact did it have on the market? – Did what they produce change the market place? Did it displace a competitor? Did it define a new category of products? Did it make the company better? Do analysts, customers or the press say what was produced was innovative?
- What was the profit contribution? – How much profit did it bring the company? Did it raise the stock price? Innovation is important to success. But it shouldn’t cost so much that you never recoup the costs.
- Do they repeat? – Anybody can get lucky once. But delivering innovative things 2, 3 or 4 times in a timely manner means the producers are Innovators.
With this you can then identify and put policies in place to further foster your innovators or have a business case to hire them.
A lack of innovators within a company may not bankrupt it. But as we have seen time and time again a company with the right amount of innovators will make more profit, have a more engaged workforce and take the customers of those that don't.
The Future of HCM Analytics-iHRIM Article
Had an article published in this issue of iHRIM October-November magazine on the Workforce Predictions and it will be handed out at HRTech in two weeks.
iHRIM article - The Future of HCM Analaytics
The world of analytics has shifted emphasis over the past 2 decades - from looking at the past to looking at the future. Organizations who have made this shift, realized the basic fact that the billions and billions of pieces of information being produced every single day can be used to answer, fairly accurately, what will probably occur at some given point in the future.
Although predicting the future sounds mystical and straight out of science fiction (like in movies like The Minority Report and Paycheck where predicting the future for all facets of life is the norm), the reality is that we’re already doing this today and you are being impacted by these predictions in almost every aspect of your own day to day existence – it’s called predictive analytics.
Examples from everyday life:
- Supermarkets know more about people who use their frequent shopper cards than do their friends on Facebook.
http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/centres/acrs/research/whitepapers/hidden-side-of-loyalty.pdf
- Credit rating companies such as FICO or Experian gather every person’s financial history in order to predict how credit worthy that person is – every single day. This single predicted score (e.g. 800 = very low risk or 600 = very high risk) is provided to lenders in order to determine how much money to lend, to employers to determine how responsible a person is, or to the owner of the credit score who will be provided with recommendations on how to improve their score. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_score
- Major League Baseball captures every move made by every player during every game. It then crunches this information to determine a player’s and team’s weaknesses, strengths and performance in given play-situations and based on this ‘predicted performance’, coaches determine who their starter should be against a particular team and even how much players should be paid. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-31/baseball-is-set-for-deluge-in-data-as-monitoring-of-players-goes-hi-tech.html
- In 6 hours the NSA collects enough digital information on people, which if printed, can fill the Library of Congress, and these data mining and predictive capabilities were instrumental in finding and tracking Osama Bin Laden. http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-05/every-six-hours-nsa-gathers-much-data-stored-entire-library-congress
- Companies are starting to mine millions of tweets and stock transactions a day in order to predict if their stocks will perform better or worse depending upon the general public mood.
http://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2011-05-11/a_global_mood_ring_for_financial_markets.html
There are a few common threads across these examples. First, all of them are using historical information (1 second past is historical) to make predictions. Second, the predictions being made are about people’s behaviors. More specifically predictions on how they will perform, what they will buy, how they could be improved, who they are connected to and what is their mood. Third, they are looking at information that comes from a few to several thousands of sources. Fourth, decision makers can determine the best course of action to minimize challenges or exploit opportunities and fifth, organizations are spending billions of dollars annually on making predictions about people and it has proven effective. With HR being all about…well people…this would seem to be a natural fit.
HR is currently delivering information to managers and executives on items that they already know about like, what their headcount is, what it is forecasted to be by quarter-end or year-end, what a worker’s past performance rating was, when they will be going on vacation and even if they are taking too much vacation. While these items are important to document, it does not tell the business anything new and is primarily geared towards delivering on the next phase of Human Resource “back office” automation.
In order for HR to truly deliver on the promise of being “business partners”, it needs to tell the business scenarios’ that are predicted to happen in the future, across all levels of the organization, which they do not already know about and to provide recommendations on how to fix or exploit it. Analytics, like headcount reports, need to shift from a mere ‘what they already know’ to one which will not only a) tell an organization that 5 additional people need to be hired because 5 specific individuals are expected to join the competitors but also b) the reasons they will leave e.g., the competitors have several positions that match our workers skills, that they are paying more since inflation is on the rise, that a pay increase has been given in the past 24 months, or that the competitors are beginning to out innovative our organization.
With Human Resource organizations having difficulty delivering fully robust and accurate headcount reports, this may seem like something that should be explored at some distant future and that’s the wrong approach. HR struggles to get basic funding for important analytics initiatives and a 2009 Forrester Report showed that companies spend less than 1% of their business
intelligence budget on HR. With HR making up, on average, 31% of a company’s total operating costs, the assumption is that this should be one of the top 3 funding areas. The reality though is that all other functional areas have been able to quantify a business case by showing that their analytics initiatives lead to actions the business must take and/or didn’t know about before, such as increasing sales, competitors stealing customers, reducing spending, improving productivity, or even to meet federal laws. The current model for today’s HCM Analytics just does not provide that “business driver” to spend more on it and this “business driver”, as discovered by other functional areas, would be to tell the organization what it does not already know, why it is happening and how to fix or exploit it. All of this is predictive analytics and without it HR will continue to struggle to obtain the funding and support for their must-have analytics initiatives.
HR can do predictive analytics today by partnering with organizations (e.g. sales, marketing and engineering) that have predictive analytics already in place to make quantifiable and actionable predictions about the workforce in areas that the business does not know about. Several companies have done this and Oracle for example, was able to build a business case using this approach. In 3 weeks Oracle was able to predict which top performers were predicted to leave the organization and why - this information is now driving global policy changes in how to retain key performers and has provided the approved business case to expand the scope to predicting worker performance.
HR is at a cross roads where analytics is concerned. The current approach simply does not work which is proven by the fact that companies spend less than 1% on a problem that costs them 31%. In order for HR to be successful in analytics it must embrace the shift towards predictive analytics. Without making the shift, HR will not be able to deliver on the promise of being a “Business Partner”.
Mobile Applications for Human Resources
Co-Wrote an article recently that just got published in iHRIM's June/July issue on Mobile Applications...enjoy.
We all remember our first mobile device. The anticipation of getting this little device made us giddy with excitement with the mere thought of how it would make our lives easier and more productive by allowing us to be continuously connected and reachable. It made that $599 price tag or $299 with a 2 year contract with your mobile provider appear cheap and there is little doubt that in the past couple of years these devices have finally delivered on the value we expected.
With the re-invention of the tablet, with enough computing power to rival your standard laptop of 5 years past and smart phones now common place, the question is no longer a matter of “should Human Resources capitalize on this medium to better support the workforce” but ‘How can HR do so”. The facts over the past year have clearly put that question to rest.
2010 Mobile Device Facts:
- Gartner determined that consumers bought 1.6 billion (yes billion) mobile devices in 2010, of which, 304M or 19% were smart phones: http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2011/02/09/245333/Smartphones-drive-surge-in-mobile-device-sales.htm
- Forester projects that Tablets will overtake Desktop sales by 2015: http://www.inquisitr.com/76157/tablets-to-overtake-desktop-sales-by-2015-laptops-will-still-reign/
- Statcounter tells us that more people in the U.S. browse the web from an iPad (around for just 1 year) than from Linux-based desktop operating systems (around for 20 years): http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/04/20/ipad-used-more-than-linux-computers/
- On May 11, 2010 there were 4,935 positions posted on Monster requiring applicants to have some domain in mobile devices.
2010 Mobile Application Facts:
To put this into perspective, in 2010, there was more than twice as many people buying smart phones (304M) then there were people signing up for Facebook (118M users). It’s now just a matter of how, what and when Human Resources will deliver.
Before You Start
Before seriously pursuing a Mobile HR Initiative, companies need the following questions answered:
Does your company support mobile devices? Does your organization already have corporate accounts with providers (AT&T/ Verizon et al), has decided which mobile devices to standardize on (e.g. Apple iPhone & iPad vs. HTC Android and Motorola Xoom) and are all these programs accessible to your targeted workers.
Can your company support mobile devices? Emailing and calendaring support will now be just one facet of your mobile strategy, not your entire mobile strategy. Some things like support processes can be leveraged but mobile applications will require new capabilities and possibly the hiring of new people to maintain them. Also, for your major work centers, you need to make sure you have enough 3G/4G towers nearby and local Wi-Fi infrastructure to support the increase bandwidth demand.
Can your company afford mobile devices? Emailing and calendaring for a worker on a mobile device is relatively low data usage and costs the company a few dollars per month. If you add applications to this, a worker’s data usage and costs could jump through the roof. One large enterprise company in Europe did a pilot program on HCM Analytics/Apps and the data costs jumped from a few Euros to over 100 Euros per month per worker. In the U.S. we are lucky to have cheaper “all you can eat” smart phone data plans which on average costs $49 per month domestically or $69 per month globally. If you are going to support Tablets, get the Wi-Fi version for the non-road warriors. Data plans for tablets do not support the “all you can eat” usage plans and charge by the gigabit.
Are your mobile devices secure and compliant? With mobile applications you are forced to potentially publish and locally store worker and organizational data such as headcount, compensation, performance ratings, etc. on the mobile device itself (if you want offline capabilities). Not only will you have to have deploy a multi-level security scheme (e.g. password upon entry, VPN, encryption of local data, if device lost-recovery or remote wipe capabilities), but you will also have to ensure you are compliant with Federal and local regulatory rules (e.g. Is passing employee data on a mobile device outside the corporate domain across international boundaries and then stored locally, compliant?).
Do you know which workers need mobile applications? Not all workers should be provided with a mobile device, let alone access to mobile HCM Analytics. The standard workers who need mobile applications are executives, road warriors, sales, potential new hires, and workers always in the field (e.g. geologist looking for oil deposits, on-site project managers at a construction site, or consultants). This roughly means only about 20% of your total workforce needs them immediately and even then, they will all probably need different applications.
If a company answered “no” to any of the 5 questions, it should wait until there is a yes to all. If all were answered with a “yes”, then it probably already has mobile applications deployed and rolling out HR mobile applications just became a whole lot easier.
What Should these “Apps” Look Like
To get a sense of what and how people are using mobile devices let’s take a look at what applications people are using and how they are using the devices.
Top Grossing Applications on Smart Phones
|
Ranking |
Top Grossing iPhone App |
Top Grossing Android App |
| 1 | Texas Poker | Paradise Island |
| 2 | Zynga Poker | Bakery Store |
| 3 | iMobster | Documents to Go |
| 4 | Tap Zoo | Exchange |
| 5 | Angry Birds (I am a big fan) | Restaurant Story |
Source: iPhone App Store, http://www.web-designers-directory.org/articles/top-rated-android-applications-for-2011-20.html
iPad Usage
What’s noteworthy about this is not the fact that people seem to play a lot of games, but that people are not using applications that require any substantial typing. Ever try filling out a form on a smart phone or a tablet? Not a fun experience. For the 21% of time spent on an iPad “communicating”, they are at most either sending a quick 1 to 2 line response to an email, writing a 160 character tweet and maybe a 1 liner comment or update on Facebook.
This is due to the fact that the form and function of a smart phone or tablet is significantly different then a laptop or desktop. This may seem obvious, but people are not interacting with their mobile devices through a mouse and keyboard. They are primarily interacting through their hands (specifically their thumbs) and probably doing a hundred other things at the same time. Because of this, most existing Human Resource applications won’t be a good fit for being used in a mobile device but applications which fit the profile below would be a good fit:
No Need for a Portal: Most of our HR Application mindset centers on connecting transactions, analytics and information to some sort of Role Based HR Portal. You don’t need to worry about that in a Smart Phone and the Smart Phone’s “desktop” should be the portal for a company’s workers. The icons on the desktop replace the links on the portal. Some smart phones allow for widgets on the desktop and content, such as alerts, can be pushed to the device.
Mobile Application vs Mobile Browser: The easiest and fastest way to get applications mobile is to make the existing ones accessible through a Mobile Browser. As stated earlier, most HCM Applications won’t be a good fit for mobile devices but certain ones such as an employee directory, may be a better fit. There are a lot of benefits to this approach - a company can leverage existing skill sets, support processes, you will not have to support at least 2 code lines (HCM web-based application and HCM mobile-based application) and your workers won’t have to learn a new application.
There are certainly some downsides to browser based mobile applications. The screen size is significantly smaller whether you are using a smart phone or tablet and this will make navigating and filling out information more difficult for users. It will also take longer for users to complete actions. Mobile applications takes fewer thumbs presses to get to, they are faster to load, faster to get from one page to the next and are geared for completing actions with your thumbs.
End-to-End Actions: The reality is that a worker, 95% of the times, will only go to an HCM mobile application if they need to take action on a single item, like a vacation request, looking up a co-workers information, etc. A more complex example could be; a Manager is trying to retain a worker while traveling. He or she would go into a mobile HCM application to review the salary of their team, then look at their department’s salary budget to determine if there is room in the budget to allow a salary increase and finally be able to give an out of cycle increase to that worker.
Completed in 2 Minutes or Less: Human Resources needs to take a page from Facebook’s exceptionally easy to use mobile application. A quick glance at an analytic, one or two thumb presses to take an action or at most one or two thumb presses followed by a quick one line write up of a note or justification. Workers have a hard time writing long emails on the iPhone or a BlackBerry, would you really want them to fill out a performance review on one of those devices? A tablet, like the iPad, is a bit better but it still takes 2 to 3x as long as it would on a laptop or desktop. Trust me, I did not write this article on an iPad.
“Mashed” with other Functional Areas: For ease of use and adoption, HCM mobile applications should be “mashed” with other functional areas like Sales. Other than the employee directory, HCM-only mobile initiatives generally have a hard time getting off the ground and teamed up with other functional areas gives them a much better chance of being funded and to be able to provide a complete offering to workers.
HR Applications Which Should go “Mobile”’
Workers would greatly benefit from the ability to access certain HR applications at any time. The greatest benefit would be in areas where information is needed or an action must be completed at a moment’s notice.
Learning: Mobile learning applications for tablets will have the greatest impact and benefits for workers. I am not talking about traditional full blown web based training classes but imagine the Wall Street Journal or The Daily. Instead of news, companies would provide highly interactive searchable content, videos, surveys, multiple-choice test and the ability for other workers to comment on or share material with others on topics such as product releases, latest marketing campaigns, targeted company profiles, etc.
Worker Directory: If there is only one mobile application a Human Resource organization is able to deploy, it should be an employee directory. The good news is that most HCM Vendors are beginning to provide this in their latest releases and the basic smart phone version will have abilities such as search by name, title, location, etc.
Tablet versions will have significantly more robust functionality and should be viewed as a light weight ERP. Along with the standard Smart Phone features, they will have organizational charts, full worker profiles, social networking and the ability to complete simple employee actions such as small job changes, updating of a goal, etc.
Workforce Communications: Intranet portals, email and twitter make up the bulk of. I am not talking about traditional full blown web based training classes but imagine the Wall Street Journal or The Daily. Instead of news, companies would provide highly interactive searchable content, videos, surveys, multiple-choice test and the ability for other workers to comment on or share material with others on topics such as product releases, latest marketing campaigns, targeted company profiles, etc.
Workforce Analytics: Similar to a worker directory, all of the major Business Intelligent vendors provide mobile applications today and there are several mobile-only providers who can build mobile dashboards off of information coming from data sources like excel. All this makes getting Workforce Analytics out to your workers practical, relatively inexpensive and possible to be deployed in a week or two.
Recruiting: Whether candidates are new college grads or seasoned pros, a recruiting mobile application is a great method to keep them engaged while making it through the sometimes tedious hiring process. It’s great medium in which to inform candidates of upcoming interview schedules, provide background on the company, the people they are interviewing with, sharing of recruiting collateral like videos, and if an offer is extended provide an updateable list of PreBoarding activities.
HR Applications that can wait to go “Mobile”
Not all HR Applications should go mobile right away. Usually the ones that would be the coolest looking are unfortunately the ones you probably want to wait on and some Human Resource applications are just too time intensive for workers or just too complex to have on a mobile device. Major areas to wait on are:
Performance Reviews or anything requiring lots of typing: Approval of Performance Reviews- definitely. A worker typing one out, manager responding on the workers review or co-workers providing a 360 should not be a mobile application. Not only is typing difficult - but do you really want a manager or co-worker providing feedback on a worker’s performance while walking from the car to the office building, walking the dog, or while grocery shopping? They are mobile. Where do you think they are going to do it?
Other major ones to wait on for the same reasons are: New Hire Paperwork, Termination Paperwork and Entry of a Resume.
Compensation Planning or any very complex transactions: Mobile applications are great for taking 1 to 2 actions such as an approval and adding a comment to that approval. They don’t do as well when you have to take multiple actions. Compensation Planning would make a great demo on an iPad and would probably make sense if that was the only way you allowed workers to give compensation increases. For the time being though, it isn’t and companies should stay away from replicating large pieces of functionality on different mediums because it is very cost and time prohibitive.
In Summary:
The facts speak for themselves - mobile devices and applications are in your workers’ everyday lives and Human Resources have a great opportunity to improve engagement and productivity of its workers by providing targeted action packed mobile applications which will make them giddy with excitement. The challenge now is whether Human Resources will be able to deliver mobile applications in the near term to meet the demand because if they don't, workers as they usually do, will develop what they need on their own and when HR ultimately delivers, it will be difficult to displace what’s already been adopted.



